Big Ten Recruiting Roundup:  Offense

By now, frequent visitors to this site have gotten to know Nebraska’s 2012 recruiting class very well.  But how does it compare to other conference schools?  Sure, you might have seen recruiting rankings that compare NU’s collection of talent to the other Big Ten programs as a whole.  But what do we learn when we get under the hood?

First, here’s a quick overall summary.  Whether your criteria is total points or average stars, Ohio State appeared to bring in the top class, Michigan was second best and Nebraska third according to Rivals.com.  You might get a different feel based on other recruiting sites.   Rivals isn’t as heavily influenced by class size as some other sites nor does it so heavily discount junior college players (which at least for Nebraska under Bo Pelini, have been quality acquisitions), which is why its rankings ring truest.  Michigan State, Wisconsin, Purdue  and Iowa appear to be a tier below the top group and the rest of the classes are bunched along the bottom in terms of average stars.  To get a real feel though, you have to go position by position. 

 

Quarterbacks

Surprisingly, there wasn’t a quarterback that earned a four-star rating from Rivals.com recruited anywhere in the Big Ten.  So NU’s Tommy Armstrong appears as good a prospect as you can find in the conference.  Purdue signed four quarterbacks, perhaps in hopes of moving some to other positions or just in hopes that one strong one emerges.  Minnesota, Iowa, and Indiana similarly nabbed a pair.  If four-star athlete Alonzo Moore were considered a quarterback, then the Huskers would probably have the top class at quarterback.  Three schools (Michigan, Illinois, Northwestern) had no signees at the position.      

 

Running Backs

Mostly three-star running backs were taken with the key exceptions being two four-star runners by Ohio State and one each for Michigan and Iowa.  The Buckeye tandem weigh in at 200 pounds plus and the Hawkeye nearly as big at 195.  But Wolverine back Dennis Norfleet was a smallish 5’7” and 170 lbs.  That may be why they also added a pair of three-star rushers that tipped the scales at 200 pounds or more.  Purdue didn’t sign a running back.

 

Wide Receivers

No team added more than a single four-star recruit at wide receiver.  Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, Michigan State, and Nebraska all managed to find one.  The Huskers were the only school in that group to take just a single wideout.  Again, if you counted Moore as a receiver, Nebraska would have the most four-star talent at the position.  Only Illinois failed to get at least one pass-catcher with three stars. 

 

Tight End

Nine schools signed three star tight ends.  Indiana also signed a two-star tight end.  The only tight end signed by Illinois was a two-star player.  Wisconsin and Iowa did not sign tight ends.  

 

Offensive Line

This is the area where Michigan and Ohio State really distinguished themselves.  The Buckeyes signed five linemen, and three of them had four-stars.  The Wolverines signed four offensive lineman, one of them had five stars, and two more had four stars.  Iowa, Wisconsin, and Nebraska each managed to add a four-star offensive lineman, among the others that they took.  Five two-star lineman were taken (one each for Purdue, Iowa, Indiana, Northwestern, and Minnesota).

 

Next up will be the defense, along with the athletes and kickers.

Share the Love

Comments 6 comments so far

Laying out all of the recruits in the conference position-by-position is a unique way to consider things. To me, it’s another illustration that NU did better than the vast majority of its conference mates.

The quarterback example is my favorite. I’d put Tommy Armstrong up against ANY quarterback recruited within the B1G. Ditto for Westerkamp at WR.

You are correct in the assessment that the B1G is all about the line of scrimmage. Everyone is freaking out about Peat. But, the reality is NU did pretty well for itself along the line of scrimmage. Thurston is a stud OL too. And don’t forget, NU loaded up on quality offensive linemen a year ago. They are far from “thin” heading in to 2012.

Yes, Michigan and Ohio State added stronger classes than NU. But, again, NU only had 17 players in this class. If they had, say 23-25, the margin between NU and the #2 spot would be significantly less.

The reality is that since 2009, NU has been very competitive within the B1G in terms of quality recruiting classes. There is every reason to believe that Pelini and his staff will keep NU in the top portion of the conference (top 4 or better) every year in terms of recruiting. Basically - compete with Michigan and Ohio State for players, not with Minnesota and Indiana.

That the Huskers were the only school in that group to take just a single wideout is my concern. In 2011 we ran the ball 68% of the time. How do you achieve any hint of balance if your numbers show run and you recruit ONE WR…

I am sure that if you go back and look at the tapes, Martinez would have had a MUCH better completion percentage had the WR’s caught the balls that were catchable. Only the coaches know how many times the WR’s ran the wrong routes.

So much for Beck running anything like what KU ran.

I agree Darren, this really puts things into perspective.  I was very excited about the recruits we did sign and even more excited about the walk-on class…I think Cotton did his best work with the offensive line last year and I’d be interested to see if sacks allowed went down or up from 2010 to 2011…it sure felt like our line blocked better despite having many injuries during the year.

Howard - I agree that Beck’s offense is supposed to be more balanced, in theory. And, Pelini has said publicly (just last week) that they want to get to more 50/50 on run/pass. So,  have we seen that yet? No.

Don’t let the 1 WR recruit be a false indicator though. Here’s why
1) They have a lot of young WR talent on the roster - Bell (soph), Turner (soph), Enunwa (jr) Marlowe (sr), and I understand that the really like Allen (a redshirt frosh). So, their five top returners for 2012 only has one SR in the bunch. They didn’t need a lot of WR in this class.
2) Next, we also have yet to know where two members of this class - Alexander and Moore - will play. They will start as defensive backs. They may end up a wide outs before its all over.
3) There are other pass-catching talents on the roster - Stanley J-B may move back to wide out at any time. Pelini said that Braylon Heard could be a heckava wide out if he wanted to.

Darren ~ Point well noted but just one? Please note how many Jay Norvell pulled in for OU this year. You mentioned five WR’s (one of which is a converted QB) on the depth chart and some others on the fence.  How does that compare with other balanced teams? What about the percentage of drops for the WR’s we have?

How many did Jay Norvell bring to NU when he was here?? Its a different beast trying to get kids to a school at the WR position at NU then it is at OU.. Two totally different offenses, OU is more of a pro style , while NU is more of a spread.. * ( by osbornes liking)

Commenting is not available in this section entry.
More Recent Stories...