Husker Opponent Records a Measure of Success
The Husker schedule in 2009 is the theme of the week at Big Red Network. Brandon pointed out that the Sun Belt-heavy schedule may give the Huskers a challenge, but it's the regular season schedule that's truly scary. The end of this year will tell if the Huskers have shown improvement and if Bo Pelini's efforts indicate that he is going to make this team better. By comparing the records of the teams we've played against over the past couple of years, the pattern shows that the combined records of opponents are just another measuring stick with which to compare ourselves.
In 2008, Nebraska was 9-4 with the bowl win. If we take out the bowl opponent, Clemson, the combined record of our opponents in 2008 was 85-68. Those same opponents had a combined record of 86-68 the year before. Without Clemson, six of those teams were in 2008 bowl games and five of those teams were at bowls in 2007. Of course, we're only comparing these two years for the opponent records, but you can see that the strength of the opponent in 2008 could be somewhat predicted by the opponents' schedules in 2007. Most of the years I browsed indicated a similar pattern (the strength of schedule can be pretty accurate when using the previous year's opponent records).
When you look at the combined record of those opponents that we lost to, they had a record of 43-12 in 2008 and 43-10 in 2007. The opponents that we defeated had a combined record of 42-56 in 2008 and 43-56 in 2007. What these numbers tell me is that if Nebraska shows no improvement or even slides a little bit, we will lose to all the teams that had double digit wins and defeat the teams that didn't. Getting another 8-4 regular season would be nothing to feel bad about, but in order to see the improvement, I need to see the Huskers steal one of these four games this year: Virginia Tech, Missouri, Texas Tech, or Oklahoma. In addition to that, they can't slip up on any of the scary games, or they're going to have to steal two of the big games. I'm going to have high expectations as most Husker fans usually do, but I would be more than content with another 8-4 regular season with the possibility of a Big 12 North Championship and another shot at a bowl game.
In 2009, our opponents have a combined 2008 record of 86-67. At this junction in the off season, most pundits, bloggers, and media members are looking at the schedule we have and counting of those "Big Game" losses that Nebraska will "probably" have. Last year, I was accused of having over the top expectations by calling for 9 wins (with a bowl game) so early before the season began. I wanted to make sure that I could carefully analyze the Huskers schedule this year. Would it be over the top to call for another similar year for the Big Red? Probably not. But so far, I find it hard to make that leap and say that the Huskers are going to get 10 somehow this year. A double digit win season starts to put Nebraska in the same sentence as Texas Tech, Texas, and Oklahoma.
Did you enjoy this article?
Get Husker news by email
Follow us on Twitter
Related Stories: Scheduling
Post a comment

5 comments so far
JBLING22 May 20 09
Personally I could see a 10 win season...It would take soome luck...The way I see it we should win against F- Atlantic, Arkansas State, La Lafayeette, Texas Tech (Lost an offense much like us), Iowa State, Kansas State..( 6 wins) .. Colorado, Missouri, Kansas, and Baylor (We have problems vs mobile qbs and playing on hostile territory) could be potential losses, but I still think NU can take away at least 2 wins probably 3 from this group.(8 wins-9 Wins).. The Oklahoma game is probably a loss.. And winning in Vicksburg (I mean Blacksburg) is pretty damn tough.. If we win at Va Tech that could be the step or jump in which we need to get back to old standards, if VA Tech can get that week one win.. The 1oth win would either have to come from beating all four of the teams mentioned above (baylor, missouri,colorado, Kansas), stealing one from Va Tech, and or winning the Bowl game.. Our best bet might be wining a bowl game though and I definately see how 9 wins could be the number...
Heres how I see the season going.. Keep in mind, just my opinion... Open for interpretation...
SEP 5 Fla. Atlantic W
SEP 12 Arkansas State W
SEP 19 @ Virginia Tech W/L
SEP 26 La. Lafayette W
OCT 3 @ Missouri W/L
OCT 17 Texas Tech W (YES I THINK WE WIN)
OCT 24 Iowa State W
OCT 31 @ Baylor W
NOV 7 Oklahoma L
NOV 14 @ Kansas W
NOV 21 Kansas State W
NOV 27 @ Colorado W
Big Twelve Championship L IF WE MAKE IT.. Texas and OU are to tough...
Bowl Game? W/L
bnahusker May 20 09
Would somebody PLEASE do something about this nagging feeling in the middle of my gut?
I don't know if Howard Schnellenberger is haunting me or if it is the memory of another up and coming team out of Florida that marched out of Memorial Stadium with a surprise win in 1980.
Florida State - 18
Huskers - 14
I just can't shake loose of the thought that it is looking like a "Trap" game. I know it does not fit the normal definition of a trap game. It just kind of feels like one.
Please help!
GBR
Bob
Brandon May 20 09
bnahusker,
For some reason, this gives me some confidence regarding FAU. Remember last year when Schnellenberger said Texas wasn't tough prior to their season opener in Austin? (See here:http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_college/2008/08/howard-schnelle.html) The Longhorns beat the Owls 52-10 and this was in week one when everyone thought Texas would be good, but not necessarily a national title contender.
Now I loved it when Schnellenberger went on the offensive. You almost have to when you're at an FAU-type school playing a Top 10 ten, but the fact that he knew he'd rile up the Horns and then his team wasn't even able to keep it close makes me think the program isn't quite as far as long as he expects. Will one year change that? I guess we'll see.
Here's my first game storyline prediction four months out: Lee plays like a QB in his first start--some good, some bad--Helu/Castille have good games but nothing jaw-dropping, maybe 160-170 yards combined, but the defense, which isn't without it's fair share of question marks, looks improved and carries NU to a 27-13 win.
tom May 21 09
I want to come out and make a prediction like 10 wins this year, but I just don't necessarily see it. There are too many unknowns this year, and I think this team feels too much like we will beat the teams we should beat and lose to the teams we should definitely lose to. I haven't seen anything (other than Suh) indicate a magical increase in how well we play this year.
husker in TX May 21 09
Nebraska does not have an offensive rythem under Lee. Until that rythem is established, those first handful of games are going to be UNEASY with stupid breakdowns. The spring game showed how fragile a new QB going live can be. Watson will be relying heavily on the Helu-Q tandem, but until the pass mix is solid, NU will have to will by pure physical play. I like the tightend showing, but a deep ball threat needs to be tuned before we go to VT. GO BIG RED!!!!!!