Building the Right Foundation

Comments 6 comments so far by

While there’s a lot of excitement surrounding Nebraska football coming off a Gator Bowl victory, there’s certainly some recognition that the team still has a lot of rebuilding to do. That’s why it would have been tempting for the Husker coaching staff to load heavily with junior college players in order to address some short term needs. But Bo Pelini’s staff avoided the quick fix and that should pay off for the team down the road.

Compare the 2005 recruiting class of Nebraska with that of Oklahoma and how it paid off in 2008. The Huskers found a number of players that contributed to the team in 2005 and 2006, only to be long gone by 2008. Frantz Hardy, Ola Dagunduro, Zac Taylor, and Barry Cryer all contributed to Nebraska’s 2006 Big 12 North Championship. Zack Bowman and Steve Octavien also seemed like worthwhile recruits in hindsight (though injuries took them out of the mix in 2006). Still, a number of junior college scholarships were ultimately wasted (Justin Tomerlin, Tyrell Spain, Brock Pasteur, and Jordan Picou are names that spring to mind). But even when those scholarships pay off, it puts you at a disadvantage in terms of the “system experience� you can put on the field four years later.

The remnants of the 2005 class for Nebraska that had meaningful contributions in 2008 were Chris Brooks, Ndamukong Suh, Cody Glenn, Marlon Lucky, Jacob Hickman, and Phillip Dillard (Barry Turner likely would have been too, had he not been injured). The Sooners by contrast were able to field a team that included four two-deep offensive linemen (Duke Robinson, Brian Simmons, Jon Cooper, and Brandon Braxton), tight end Brody Eldridge, receivers Juan Iglesias and Manuel Johnson, fullback Matt Clapp, nose guard Cordero Moore, linebackers Keenan Clayton, and Lamont Robinson, safety Nic Harris, and cornerback Brian Jackson. That’s an advantage of about thirteen to six, and that experience sure showed when the two teams faced off in Norman. And it was due to the fact that 89% of OU’s 2005 class came from the high school ranks.

Now compare the 2005 NU class to its 2009 version. The 2009 class has only two junior college players out of 21 (including Antonio Bell). By contrast, the 2005 class had a total of 12 junior college recruits in a large class of 31 players. So the Huskers now built a class that consisted of over 90% high school players versus just over 61% with full eligibility four years ago. That means more of these guys will be around four years from now. That said, another critical detail will be retention. Those six players from the class of 2005 of Nebraska came from a pool of nineteen players – the same number they found in this class. That means less than 31% of them became contributors this past year. OU by contrast got meaningful contributions four years later from 54% of their 2005 high school class (thirteen out of twenty-four). So getting ninety percent of your kids from the high school ranks is only half the battle. The other big factor is making sure those scholarships go to worthy candidates.

We won’t know whether Pelini and company spent those scholarships well or not for quite a while. What we do know is that over 90% of the class of 2009 will not have exhausted their eligibility in 2012, and that seems like the right way to start when building your program for the long term.

Did you enjoy this article?

Get Husker news by email Get Husker news by email
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter

Comments 6 comments so far

Paul Feb 18 09

I agree with the overall premise, however it is not likely that 90% of a class will be present 4 years later as you conclude at the end of the article. With transferring, guys giving up, disipline actions ect. there will inevitably be attrition. That being said, the guys that are left will have 4-5 years in the system and being taught the right way, and that counts for a lot of success in the field. GBR.

Steve Feb 18 09

Good point Paul. I don't believe 90% of these folks will be around in 2012, either (unfortunately). I've edited that list bit.

Greg Morrow Feb 18 09

Oh, I didn't realize Steve was going to address the '05 class, before I commented on Tom's article. Wild coincidence, I guess!

JCs compromise your depth. It's just the bottom line.
The program has had to "settle down" so to speak, with recruiting.
Almost all recruits should now realize that they "ain't ready" and can benefit from a year on the sidelines. There's alot of players on the roster who are now 3rd year sophomores and 4th year juniors who are now honestly ready to win their individual battles, next fall.
Like our walkon superstars, who seem to emerge undetected as 4th and 5th year juniors and seniors and beat out younger kids.

Again, the program has settled down. Don't think it was a wake up call for the younger receivers, who realized the seniors were A LOT better than them? In every possible way?
Now, they should be "primed" to help out the new qb.

FischAlum'83 Feb 18 09

Has any one heard the status of young levinson the db from Crete? 1 week ago it was reported he was not with the team but still on scholorship...for now. I had high hopes for him, hope he is back with the team.

JBLING22 Feb 19 09

It sounds like Levorson is gone but whom knows for sure... they usually let them keep their scholarship til the end of the year in the athletic department.. Joe McCray from the b-ball team was kicked off the team, as well as Cody Glen, and they kept them till the end of the semester/year... If they didn;t it would send the wrong message that school isn't important./

donfl Feb 19 09

Steve, your comments are "rite on." I've said it before on this site that one needs only to look at KState and what Bill Snyder did. A perscription for internal hemmoraging! I don't care who you are, BS or BC you cannot build continuity into a program by dipping heavily into the JUCO ranks. The reason we were so dominant under the Devaney, Osborne era was every year the Husker had the players ready to simply reload. That is one of the reasons people hated to play us!!! Hope we get back to that philosophy. GBR

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published or shared with anyone.
Not sure if your comment belongs here? Read our commenting guidelines.

NextNextPreviousPrevious