The 2007 Defensive Line

Nebraska’s sure to have a new look at quarterback in 2007. For better or worse, Sam Keller will not look like Zac Taylor. Likewise, the 2007 defensive line will look substantially different than the 2006 unit, for a number of reasons.
A New Coach
Buddy Wyatt doesn’t come into Nebraska with quite the resume that John Blake did. Nevertheless, he’s had an impressive run thus far. One benefit for returning players is that in addition to anything valuable they’ve gained under Blake, they’ll likely be exposed to things that Blake never shared. While turnover and turmoil prevailed at Nebraska over the early part of the decade, a number of former players that have successfully transitioned to the NFL have mentioned that being exposed to new systems was helpful in their development. For better or worse, it’s not likely to be more of the same.
New Faces
In addition to the reserves that will likely earn starting roles like Ndamukong Suh and Barry Turner, the Huskers recruited seven defensive lineman (three of them junior college players) in their most recent class. Among them was Shukree Barfield who participated in Spring football along with 2006 recruit, defensive tackle Brandon “Beast” Johnson. In all likelihood the two-deep will include Suh, Barfield, Johnson, Steinkuhler, and Turner. Beyond those four Zach Potter, Pierre Allen, Andy Poulosky, Clayton Sievers and David Harvey are among returning players contending for playing time. Seth Jensen is another name if he can get healthy, as is Craig Roark. Beyond all those names, Steve Octavien may also line up as a defensive end at times. So there will be no shortage of bodies. The question will be whether they can find eight guys that can collectively play at a level equal or greater to what we saw in 2006.
Less Responsibility
In many ways, the front seven had to carry the defense in 2006. In 2007, they will be backed by a very solid linebacking corps and an improved secondary. That means their positive contributions might be magnified (e.g. more interceptions) and their mistakes might be less apparent (more help behind them to clean up). For a young group less is more. Less to learn, less to know, and less to worry about. Hopefully, these guys will have the luxury of playing within themselves and having that be enough.
Outlook
Only injury will stop Suh from being a quality starter. Beyond that, the sky’s the limit. Assuming Turner comes back to peak form, he’s also going to be a quality starter. I’d be surprised if Barfield is not at least “serviceable” and I think the same can be said of Brandon Johnson and Ty Steinkuhler. There are enough bodies after that, where you have to figure there will be at least one more adequate rotation player. On the upside, they could well find another standout or two. We’ll start to learn about this group no sooner than week 2, when the Huskers head to Winston-Salem. They’ll need a solid effort to beat the defending ACC champs. Without it, the game could be much too close or worse (I won't even say it). No part of the team as a unit will do more to determine the fortunes of the 2007 Huskers than the defensive line. And right now, no part of the team is more up in the air as to how good it will be.
» Enjoy this article?
Send it to your friend or get Husker news by email!
Related Stories: Defense, Defensive Line
Post a comment

7 comments so far

Scott May 24 07
I think this group has the potential to be a good defensive line. But if they don't come around and if the defensive backfield doesn't show they have improved then it could make for a long season. The fun part is that we as fans get to see how this all takes shape. That's the beauty of college football.
darren May 24 07
Yes, it will be an interesting experiment along the d-line this year. What gives me the most hope is the sizable talents possessed by Suh and Turner.
*IF* those two play to potential, then they could be the kinds of players that demand attention and double teams, and allow for the players around them to get favorable match ups or opportunities.
Grant May 24 07
I see the D-line as being a solid group. No, they don't have the experience last year's did, but we could say that every few years about every group. Steinkuhler is mean, tough, and extremely quick. I'm hoping Roark shoots onto the scene. This is a guy that was highly recruited, but has been fighting the injury bug since arriving at NU. I think we will definitely see more 3-4 alignments, which should play to the strenghts the defensive group possesses.
Gregory May 24 07
I think it will be Turner, Suh, Johnson and Potter. Unless Ty beats out Johnson at "three technique" or Potter, at "base" end.
Gee, am I crazy, or, is this the beginngs of an athletically "hyper" D-line?
Nice articles, again!
WisconsinBigRedFish May 25 07
I would like to go on record stating Suh will be an ABSOLUTE, DOMINATING force up front. He will be first team All Big 12, and we can only hope he sticks around for another year (two if the stars, planets, and moons all align right for the mighty Husker faithful!)
Jerry Krueger May 29 07
One thing I might add. D-line player technique will improve under Buddy Wyatt. While at NU, John Blake's interest and focus was more on recruiting, and less on teaching technique. Buddy will be more focused on coaching.
'sa blang thang May 29 07
I think Wyatt will prove to be a way better coach than Blake--I was never sold on Blake as a coach, though he was a good recruiter.
Brandon Johnson looked huge--physically-- during the spring game and his play seemed to jump outta the screen. Barfield will see alot of playing time also.
The interior of this line will definitely be better than last year.
Hope Barry Turner reaches his potential this year too--as O TE(ha)!